Darwin Or Jesus? Bible-tube.com
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Archaeopteryx Debunked and more Darwinism and theory of evolution lies

Go down

Archaeopteryx Debunked and more Darwinism and theory of evolution lies Empty Archaeopteryx Debunked and more Darwinism and theory of evolution lies

Post  Admin Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:26 pm

Archaeopteryx Debunked (1985). Although no crossspecies
“missing links” (half of one species and half of another)
had ever been found, something close to it had been
discovered. As mentioned earlier, in 1861 a fossilized feather
was found in the limestone deposits in Solnhofen, Germany
(near Eichstatt). It was considered valuable since it reportedly
came from the late Jurassic strata—and there were not
supposed to be any birds back then. Soon another fossil was
offered for sale (always from the owners of the same quarry).

It was a bird with feathers, with the head and neck missing.
The British Museum paid a lot for it. So, in 1877, another
bird with feathers was offered for sale—and this one
looked like it might have the head of a small dinosaur!
In 1985, six leading scientists, including *Fred Hoyle,
examined the fossil—and found it to be a hoax. For details,
see chapter 17, Evolutionary Showcase.

Arkansas Creation Trial (1981). In December 1981 at
the Federal District Court in Little Rock, Arkansas, Judge
William Overton presided over a trial to decide whether
the State of Arkansas could place concepts about creation
in public school textbooks. The courtroom of 200
was packed with reporters. The ACLU had over 50 lawyers
and paralegals working on the case. In contrast, the Arkansas
Attorney General’s office could only commit three of its
attorneys to the case. One ACLU witness, *Francisco J. Ayala,
testified that the origin of living creatures from dirt and water,
though it occurred, was not part of evolution! That nicely
took that evolutionary puzzle out of the court trial. At any
rate, on the basis of a variety of dodges and misstatements
by the plaintiffs, the judge ruled against Arkan-
sas State. It is a known fact that the ACLU has advised
every state legislature, considering enactment of a law permitting
equal time for both views, that the ACLU will give
them another full-blown “monkey trial,” as they did at Dayton,
Tennessee in 1925.

The evolutionists never defend their
position with scientific facts, for they do not have any. Instead,
they use ridicule and lawsuits (Norman Geisler, The
Creator and the Courtroom, 1982; Robert Gentry, Creation’s
Tiny Mystery, 1986).
Radioactive Halos Disprove Molten Earth Theory
(1986). Robert V. Gentry carried on research into radiohalos
in granite for years, but was discharged from Oak Ridge
Research Laboratory in 1982 because he testified in defense
of Arkansas State at the above-mentioned trial. He then put
his years of research findings and professional articles into a
book (Creation’s Tiny Mystery, 1986). In brief, billions upon
billions of polonium 218 radiohalos are in granite, yet
each halo was formed in less than 3 minutes.

There is no way the halos could get in there after the granite was
formed, yet the granite had to be solid when the halos
formed. This means the granite was created solid in less
than three minutes! Since granite is the basement rock under
every continent, it would be impossible for the earth
to once have been a molten mass as conjectured by the
evolutionists. Interestingly enough, granite can be melted;
but it will reform into rhyolite, never into granite. See chapter
3, Origin of the Earth, for a brief summary of data on
this. Go to our website for a complete study on the subject.
Poll of Biology Teachers (1988). A survey, conducted
by the University of Texas, found that 30% of 400 highschool
biology teachers believe in Biblical creation and
only 19% believe in evolution (Waco Tribune-Herald, September
11, 1988).

Chernobyl (1986) is another evolutionist’s paradise. Since
mutations are today thought to be the leading mechanism for
achieving evolutionary change for the better, the intense
radiation which the people received on April 26, 1986,
should have brought them great benefit because of all
the mutations it induced. They should be stronger,
healthier, have improved organs, and produce children
which are higher forms of life. But this has not happened.
Scientists know that even Marie Curie and her daughter died
as a result of working with radiation. Mutations result in
harm and death, never in evolutionary change (*Isaac Asimov,
Asimov’s New Guide to Science, 1984, pp. 691-692

“I have often thought how little I should like to have to
prove organic evolution in a court of law.”—*Errol White,
Proceedings of the Linnean Society, London (1966) [an
ichthyologist (expert on fish) in a 1988 address before a
meeting of the Linnean Society in London].
“I doubt if there is any single individual within the scientific
community who could cope with the full range of
[creationist] arguments without the help of an army of consultants
in special fields.”—*David M. Raup, “Geology
and Creation,” Bulletin of the Field Museum of Natural
History, Vol. 54, March 1983, p. 18.

EVOLUTION COULD NOT DO THIS
The mallee bird lives in the Australian desert. In May or June,
with his claws the male makes a pit in the sand that is just the right size:
about 3 feet [9 dm] deep and 6 feet [18 dm] long. Then he fills it with
vegetation. As it rots, it heats up. The bird waits patiently until the
rains, which increase the heat to over 100o F. [38o C.] at the bottom of
the pile. The bird waits until it is down to 92o F. [33o C.]. When the
right temperature is reached, he calls for his wife; they mate; she lays
one egg a day for 30 days; and then leaves.

The male then covers the
eggs with sand, and continually checks the temperature with his amazing
thermometer bill for 7 weeks. He cannot let the temperature go up
or down even one degree. If it cools at night, he piles on more sand. If
it overheats in the day, he pulls off sand. At hatching time, the chicks
break their shells—and crawl up through as much as 2 feet of sand!
Arriving at the top, each one is fully able to fly and is on its own.
Neither father or mother mallee bird gives it any further attention or
training. When it grows up, it does just as its parents did.
http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-bible-and-health-more.phphttp://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-bible-and-health-more.php

Admin
Admin

Posts : 29
Join date : 2012-10-29

https://darwinorjesus.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum