Natural selection was created by God

Go down

Natural selection was created by God Empty Natural selection was created by God

Post  Admin on Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:29 pm

Does natural selection really exist? Yes
Did God create natural selection?
Yes. Can natural selection have the power to create new species? No
A fundamental teaching of evolution is that every living thing in our world—whether it be a plant, animal, or
bird,—evolved from other creatures, which ultimately
originated from dust, rock, and water.
According to Darwinian evolutionists, this ‘evolving’
was accomplished by “natural selection.” Charles Darwin said that natural selection was the primary way that
everything changed itself from lower life-forms and new species were produced.
In the years that have passed since Charles Darwin,
this theory of “natural selection” has continued as a mainstay of evolutionary theory.
In this chapter we will carefully consider natural selection, what it can do and what it cannot do. This is an
important chapter; for, along with fossil evidence (chapter 12) and mutations (chapter 10), natural selection
ranks at the top in the esteem of committed evolutionNatural Selection 283ists. Disprove the validity of these three, and the
whole theory falls apart.
STILL DEFENDED BY SOME—(#1/6 Evolutionists
Defend Natural Selection*) It is a remarkable fact that
some evolutionists still defend their natural selection
theory. But we will discover why so many have abandoned it.

or animal produces offspring, variations appear. Some
of the offspring will be different than other offspring.
Some evolutionists (Darwinian evolutionists, also
called “Darwinists”) declare that it is these variations
(which they call “natural selection”)—alone—which have
caused all life-forms on our planet: pine trees, jackals,
clams, zebras, frogs, grass, horses.
“So far as we know . . natural selection . . is the
only effective agency of evolution.”—*Sir Julian
Huxley, Evolution in Action, p. 36.

“Natural selection allows the successes, but ‘rubs
out’ the failures. Thus, selection creates complex order, without the need for a designing mind. All of the
fancy arguments about a number of improbabilities,
having to be swallowed at one gulp, are irrelevant. Selection makes the improbable, actual.”—*Michael Ruse,
Darwinism Defended (1982), p. 308.
On the face of it, the statement is false merely
from the fact that evolutionary theory requires change
by random action alone. If even half of the random
changes were positive, the other half would have to be
damaging. But *Ruse views all changes as being selectively positive. In addition he ignores other scientific
facts, such as the powerful one that the closest thing to
natural selection (gene reshuffling) never goes across
the species barrier to produce a new species.
Not only is natural selection said to have produced
284 The Evolution Crunchereverything, but the entire process is said to be entirely RANDOM! Therefore it is not “selection,” for
nothing was selected! Just whatever happened next
is what happened. Random variations and chance accidents are said to have produced all the wonders around us.
The theory should be called “natural randomness,”
not “natural selection.”

“Modern evolutionary theory holds that evolution is
‘opportunistic,’ in the word of paleontologist George
Gaylord Simpson. At any point, it goes in the direction
that is advantageous, often reshaping old structures for
new uses. It does not know its destination, nor is it impelled to follow one particular direction.”—*R. Milner,
Encyclopedia of Evolution (1990), p. 345.
How can total randomness select only that which is
better, and move only in advantageous directions? Random occurrences never work that way. Yet in the nevernever land of evolutionary theory, they are said to do so.
NEO-DARWINISM—(*#2/38 Scientists Speak about
Natural Selection*) Earlier in this century, a large number of evolutionists rebelled against this theory, saying
that natural selection has never given evidence of being able to change one species into another—and is not
able to do it. They recognized that so-called “natural selection” (actually random changes within the true species)
cannot produce cross-species change. These “neo-Darwinists” decided that it is mutations which accomplish
the changes, and that natural selection only provided the
finishing touches.


Posts : 29
Join date : 2012-10-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum