Theory of evolution false teachings

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Theory of evolution false teachings

Post  Admin on Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:11 pm

Antelope Springs Tracks (1968). Trilobites are small
marine creatures that are now extinct. Evolutionists tell
us that trilobites are one of the most ancient creatures
that have ever lived on Planet Earth, and they lived
millions of years before there were human beings. *William
J. Meister, Sr., a non-Christian evolutionist, made a
hobby of searching for trilobite fossils in the mountains of
Utah. On June 1, 1968, he found a human footprint and
trilobites in the same rock, and the footprint was stepping
on some of the trilobites! The location was Antelope
Springs, about 43 miles [69 km] northwest of Delta, Utah.

Then, breaking off a large, two-inch thick piece of rock,
he hit it on edge with a hammer, and it fell open in his
hands. To his great astonishment, he found on one side
the footprint of a human being, with trilobites right in
the footprint itself! The other half of the rock slab
showed an almost perfect mold of a footprint and fossils.
Amazingly, the human was wearing a sandal! To
make a longer story short, the find was confirmed when
scientists came and found more sandaled footprints.
Meister was so stunned that he became a Christian. This
was Cambrian strata, the lowest level of strata in the
world; yet it had sandaled human footprints! (“Discovery
of Trilobite Fossils in Shod Footprint of Human in
‘Trilobite Beds,’ a Cambrian Formation, Antelope,
Springs, Utah,” in Why Not Creation? 1970, p. 190).
The Alpbach Institute Symposium (1969). A follow-
up meeting of scientists was held and given the title, “Beyond
Reductionism.” But it only resulted in fruitless discussions
by scientists who had carefully researched the
problems, with men who were desperately trying to defend
evolutionary theories, against an ever-growing
mountain of evidence to the contrary.
First Moon Landing (1969).

By the 1950s, scientists
were able to predict that, if the moon was billions of years
old, it would have a thick layer of dust many miles thick.
This is due to the fact, as *R.A. Lyttleton explained, the
lunar surface is exposed to direct sunlight and strong ultraviolet
light and X-rays from the sun gradually destroying
the surface layers of exposed rock, reducing them to
dust at the rate of a few ten-thousandths of an inch per
year. In 5 to 10 billion years, this would produce 20-60
miles [32-97 km] of dust (*R.A. Lyttleton, quoted in R.
Wysong, Creation-Evolution Controversy, p. 175).
Because of this, NASA first sent an unmanned lander,
which made the discovery that there is very little dust on
the moon’s surface. In spite of that, Neil Armstrong feared
that he and Edwin Aldrin might suffocate when they
landed. But because the moon is young, they had no
problem. Landing on July 20, 1969, they found an average
of 3/4 inches [1.91cm] of dust on its surface.

That is the amount one would expect if the moon were about 6000-
8000 years old (at a rate of 1 inch every 10,000 years).
In *Isaac Asimov’s first published article (1958), he
predicted that the first rocket to land on the moon would
sink ingloriously in the dust, and everyone inside would
perish (Article mentioned in *Isaac Asimov, Asimov on
Science: A Thirty-Year Retrospective, 1989, pp. xvi-xvii).
Bone Inventory (1971). A complete listing of all the
Australopithecine finds, up to the end of 1971, was printed
in a new book. This included all the African bones of our
“half-ape, half-human ancestors” (*Time-Life, The Missing
Link, Vol. 2). Although over 1400 specimens are described,
most are little more than scraps of bone or
isolated teeth. Not one complete skeleton of one individual
exists. When parts of bones are found, they, of
course, can be moved into various positions and be interpreted
as belonging to different creatures with very different
skull and jaw shapes. To this day, there is no real
evidence of any genuine non-human ancestor of ours.
Chapter 13 explains why reputable scientists question or
reject the various finds by anthropologists.

*Matthews Attacks Darwinism (1971). By the latter
part of the 20th century, even though the ignorant public
continued to be told that evolution was a triumphant,
proven success, it was difficult to find any scientist who
would defend Darwin’s theories before his peers. *L.
Harrison Matthews, another distinguished scientist,
was asked to write a new introduction to Darwin’s Origin
of the Species, to replace *Thompson’s 1956 Introduction
which scathingly attacked Darwinism. In his
Introduction, Matthews said that Thompson’s attacks
on Darwin were “unanswerable.” Then Matthews proceeded
to add more damaging facts (*L. Harrison
Matthews, Introduction to Charles Darwin, Origin of the
Species, 1971 edition). The evolutionary theory must have
run into hard times, when book publishers cannot find a
reputable scientist who is appreciative either of its basic
teachings or its founder.


Posts : 29
Join date : 2012-10-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum